Torrillo & Associates

  • Contact Us
  • 484-574-8782
  • Home
  • About
    • specialists
    • our team
    • Careers
  • Audit Process
  • Services
    • CPA firm partnership
  • Clients
  • Videos
  • Blog
 March 22, 2023

Current Benefit Plan and Audit Related News and Updates

Friday, October, 03, 2014 / Published in Employee Benefit Plans, News and Press Releases, Retirement - 401(k), 403(b)

Supreme Court to Hear 401(k) Fees Case

 

As detailed in an article by Greg Stohr, 401(k) Fees at Issue as Court Takes Edison Worker Appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider giving 401(k) participants more power to sue their plans over investments that impose excessive fees, accepting an appeal tied to a wave of suits against employers.

The appeal, filed by Edison International workers, contends that participants should be able to sue plans for retaining imprudent investments. A federal appeals court said a federal statute of limitations bars suits over investments added to a plan more than six years earlier.

The case comes to the Supreme Court amid intensified scrutiny of fees in retirement accounts, now the primary savings vehicle for old age. More than a dozen companies, including Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) and ABB Ltd., have been sued since 2006. Americans held $6.6 trillion in 401(k)-type plans as of June 30, according to the Investment Company Institute.

The court agreed to take up the Edison case at the urging of the Obama administration, which told the justices that the lower court ruling “undermines the security and integrity” of billions of dollars in U.S. retirement funds.

Edison called that argument unfounded, saying the case “does not suggest any such threat to the retirement funds of America’s workers.”

Higher Fees

The lawsuit focuses on six mutual funds added to the Edison plan in 1999. The workers say the plan improperly bought retail class shares, rather than identical institutional class shares that carried lower fees. Some of the fees on the retail shares were then returned to Edison’s service provider, ultimately reducing the company’s administrative costs by $8 million, according to the workers.

Two lower courts said the workers could sue only over the three funds that were added to the plan within the six-year statute of limitations. The workers won $371,000 on those funds and say they are entitled to additional damages on the rest.

Federal law imposes a “continuing duty to provide only prudent investments in a plan regardless of when the investments were first selected,” the workers’ lawyer, Jerome Schlichter, argued in court papers.

The legal dispute turns on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which gives workers six years to sue after “the date of the last action which constituted a part of the breach or violation.”

‘Stale Lawsuits’

Edison says the use of the word “action” in the statute means an employer generally can’t be sued for failure to remove a fund. The only exception is when a change in circumstances imposes a duty on plan administrators to revisit an investment decision, the company says.

“Congress did not enact ERISA to facilitate and promote costly benefit-plan lawsuits, especially stale lawsuits challenging plan decisions made many years earlier,” Edison’s lawyer, Jonathan Hacker, argued. Edison is based in Rosemead, California.

Schlichter and his firm, Schlichter Bogard & Denton, are behind more than a dozen suits over 401(k) plans, including cases against Lockheed, ABB and Caterpillar Inc. The law firm reached a $35 million settlement with Cigna Corp. (CI) and a $30 million settlement with International Paper Co.

The justices will hear arguments early next year and rule by the end of their nine-month term in late June.

The case is Tibble v. Edison International (EIX), 13-550.

Tagged under: 401(k), 403(b), DOL, EBSA, Plan Fiduciary Update

What you can read next

IRS Terminating Proposed Penalty Notices for Untimely Filed or Incomplete Forms 5500
403(b) Pre-Approved Plan Program Established
New Revenue Procedures for the Employee Plan Compliance Resolution System, including 403(b) Plan Failures

Recent Posts

  • DOL ISSUES CHANGES TO 2023 FORM 5500

    The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), the Interna...
  • SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022

    SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 was passed by Congress a...
  • DOL Proposed Changes to VFCP, including Adding Self-Correction for Late Contributions

    The U.S. Department of Labor announced that its...

Categories

  • Employee Benefit Plans
  • Forms and Procedures
  • News and Press Releases
  • Policy Updates
  • Retirement – 401(k), 403(b)
  • Uncategorized

Torrillo & Associates, LLC specializes in employee benefit plan audits, 401k audits, 403b audits, pension plan audits, and retirement plan audits. We are licensed in 7 states including New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.  With firm mobility, we are also able to practice in an additional 27 states.

36 Regency Plaza
Glen Mills, PA 19342

view on map »

Careers
Phone: 484-574-8782
Fax: 484-574-8785

  • GET SOCIAL
Torrillo & Associates

Copyright © 2010 to 2023 Torrillo & Associates, LLC. All rights reserved. v07.03.22.WPE| Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

TOP
X
Worried about your yearly Benefit Plan Audit? Call us now for a free consultation!
Call Us
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT